Posts by Purely
-
-
-
3 Echovald Q9T -2 Stance 1/20 Tactic 220gv - 2a
-
Echovald Shield q8 Tac -2wS +10 vs Ogres
20a
-
Echo9 7a
25a to b/o the 3 I've offered on. LMK
-
echo2 10a
echo6 5a
echo9 3a
or bin all 20a this weekend (pm me)
-
-
EC17 - 2a
EC10 - 10a if Monk From Above does not claim the item.
-
30a bundle
-
-
2005 - 2010: Old un-Permabanned Main
2010-Current: Main
2010-Current: Alt I started with new main in 2010 because why remake 1 GWAMM account when you can do 2 at the same time?
Maybe about 1/4 is afk time though.
-
i dont want to be rude but.
Lol ?
same lol.... xD
xxa imo
get some offers from the purple guys
-
-
EC6 2a
EC7 2a
EC8 2a
EC9 1a
EC10 7a
EC12 2a
EC13 2a
-
-
skull vs dwarves 16a
-
-
-
skull vs dwarves 6a
-
5a holy rod. lmk
-
-
Bump
Thanks to TopheVendor for 3 new Echovalds:
q9t -Cripple -2wS
q9s Domination -2wS
q9s -Cripple -5(20)
-
-
Echo q9str -2st 1/20 Dom - 50e
Echo q9str -5/20 Cripple - 50e
Echo q9str 60wH -2wE - 50e
Echo q9tact -2wS Cripple - 1a
-
Thanks for all the bids, just next level lowball. But if no more interest I will take them down again, have a nice day
Then give us some prices. I really don’t think I’m out of the ballpark on this item no one will ever use.
5a on 4
-
Do I even know you? Lol
75a
-
-
-
-
-
-
I have a small storm artifact collection that would be a decent home for this if you wanted to sell. Unfortunately I don't really have a clue on a price for it. Just don't merch it. PM me or list it.
-
-
-
And that last one is where it becomes difficult: upon a re-evaluation, we are required to provide the proof as well. It's just like back in the day when ArenaNet banned users depending on what processes ran on their computers; due to a GDPR request, ArenaNet had to give the proof upon which basis the users were banned. And this makes it difficult.
As always, I appreciate the candid response, but explain to us why you (GWL) haven't taken alternative actions to label suspected individuals as such? You can always remove the "suspected" label once they've quelled suspicion. Or does something like this also require a burden of proof? Also, why can you not just ban them and wait for the re-evaluation request to reinstate the person? I understand this sounds like a headache. I'm only asking for the sake of discussion / understanding.
Edit: To explain further, the point of a ban followed by a re-evaluation request strategy, in my opinion, would possibly result in the users giving up before even sending the request for evaluation. Sure, some might, but I doubt they all would. Who knows.
-
matching q9fc gilded artifacts 20/20 insp and 20/20 dom
offer?
-
First off, I don't care if people sell botted items, so I'm in no way suggesting you do what I'm about to say. I just don't. It's a dead game. More activity is better in my opinion. And before anyone tells me to take the foot out of my mouth, everyone knows I sold items for a botter Ether 2-3 years ago (it probably helped spark this thread). I never did the botting myself, but Looney some botters are using 50-100 accounts, maybe more. Either way, Ryn aka Ether used about 40-50 accounts then, but that was years ago now. I saw them with my own eyes over discord stream, but even this is not enough "proof" to ban someone because for all anyone knows, I could be making it all up (I'm not. Or am I?).
Second, I've already accepted GWL's stances and dictator-like moderation, but. . .
But if someone that we ban as a cheater comes to me and requests me the proof on which grounds the ban has been given, I need to be able to provide that.
. . .why this? In my experience, you guys do what you think is the "right" thing all the time, so why do you even care about needing proof for a highly suspected botter account (example: created recently, 1 post, hundreds of items for sale, no other activity, etc)? This isn't a democracy. There is no "innocent until proven guilty" rule. You own this forum, do you not? Is there some kind of regulation that's got you by the balls preventing you from taking action? Personally, if someone pisses with my shit, I fight back. If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it's probably a duck. When it comes to this issue, all it looks like is you guys laying down and taking it. And to the argument that the botters will just make new accounts, just let bsoltan ban them over and over again until they quit like he likes deleting posts. "Git'm boy!"
Another suggestion would be to label suspected accounts using the Custom User Title. Enter "Suspected Botter" then disable them from changing it until they've given sufficient evidence that they are in fact not botting. Check out mine as an example. I'm sure there's a bunch of creative things like this at your disposal, but has anything even been done after "looking into it" for two years?
Nevertheless, I just want to reiterate that I, just like the GWL moderation team, really don't care about their presence on the forum because any activity is better than no activity in a dead game.
-
15a echo bundle, retract old bundle
-
-
