#3 5a
#4 3a
#3 5a
#4 3a
B/o + 5a hex exalted
Interesting. What makes you think Q7 white and blue being possible = purple / gold was possible?
Never considered that to be a connection given that white and blues drop Q8 from foes not capable of dropping Q8 purple/gold now.
Everything was different back then I know but as an example is pretty odd there is plenty of of Q7 white / Blue magmas but no purple and gold isn't it?
A little while ago for no particular reason I decided to get exactly 10 times the max survivor title. Anybody got a title more that 10x over?
I'm thinking there is some very high Treasure hunters out there? + sweet tooth's over 100k+ from pcons? Lets see who else has spend to much time playing guildwars
I've spent ALOT of time on Istan farming stuff and never seen a Tribal Shield (effigy) drop. I agree with Looney that its kourna area. Perhaps there's a low enough level something there from a quest ect that might technically provide a Q0? The lvl 10 Irontooth Drake in Floodplain during Drakes on a plain?
You missed SotW on ya Tryian list
Emblazoned is 100%, there is a screen. MaxBorken can provide it + tell the sad story of its fate?
Kappa I think is 100%, Pleikki had one, screen maybe?
To my knowledge Magmas, Eternal, Shadow and gloom never dropped gold/purple Q7.
Crude, skull and Tower I thought was possible but don't have an example to share, ill leave for somebody else to confirm/deny.
Can anybody confirm or deny that Q7's dropped in pongmei and or why no Echovald, Embossed, Gothic, Ornate, Amber seem to have happened?
My memory of 2006 is not good.
And in the interest of thoroughness anybody wana disagree that Q7 Exalted, Outcast & Zodiac aren't a thing?
So then should we just answer "put it on sale and see" on every post ?
Yes please. Then we can all agree PC thread is worthless fortune telling and remove it
system.fan We cant just use a tape measure. We need a scale and a protractor
I wasn't gonna post here anymore because its only flaming and no respect of anykind shown here, but i want to give my last cents and use similar metaphor with it.
So, these items been on display on the original, main museum (collection thread) for several years without odd frames and signatures seen for everyone, then new side gallery is made, that has 1/250th of popularity of the original museum and it has copies of the items with different display, and the original pieces are still seen on that 250 times more popular original museum with signatures after all this for everyone to see.
You backing out because you have lost the argument. Plain and simple. Allow me to pick apart these ridiculous points.
Yes previous posts in other threads without "odd frames" were no problem. You will notice nobody saying anything about those cause there was no problem.
Shockingly a part of legacy that was created in September doesn't have as many views as beloved made over 4 years ago. Somehow in ur mind this is a justification for different standards. It doesn't matter if you miss represent items here because people can look back through 50 pages and find were they were posted before? Can you see what an utterly absurd defense this is? You have been shown respect but you don't deserve it if that's the best you can come up with.
Your position is this: I did it honest once so please accept my dishonesty now.
Nuff said.
I appreciate the clarification. You and I will never agree that items customized to another can be incorporated into a collection you claiming to be yours, especially a structured one. If people are going to do that I think its important to have maximum transparency with it. Make it very clear those items are in your possession and not conceal who they are customized to. If you presenting the items in a way you cant see the custo lines and thus nobody can tell they signed by another it needs to be expressed another way. A simple "these ones friends contributed from there collections and still bare their signatures" would prevent any issues.
Thanks for replying. I should clarify. I know how you done it, I just don't know why. You love customizing things and you taking screens of them that don't show that seemed out of character. If its for keeping the images smaller I can understand and that's fine. My main concern and I think the concern from others was, is this an attempt to hide the custo line for a different reason. The confusion about stuff "got from friends" but still trying to buy another and additional stuff you did show custoed to others claimed as part of ur warrior collection only adds to that.
Pleikki I didn't post this on ur thread out of respect for what collection section is supposed to be about. Instead I'll address it here and pose a related question.
Personally I'm just confused. You gone from: "I do love writing my name on items! Think it is the best part of collecting in General!" and "every great piece of art deserves to be regonized in the books of history." to cropping out the custo, the gold value and the boarder. You posting things custoed to others and claiming they ur warriors?!? You have things in a collection that you "got from friends" but you "still seeing if i can find some on my own to replace those ones". What does that mean? are they urs, are they on loan, are they custoed to the original owner? Maybe clarify these kinda things better and you wont get people looking upon it suspiciously. You do what you want, but imo any perceived disrespect you feel was bought on by your own actions with these strange posts. So unnecessary as well, such quality items speak for themselves you don't need all this nonsense.
Which leads me to my question:
Is displaying customized items in a way that hides that fact they customized something people should be doing?
(in my view no, seems dishonest)
I got loads, probs one you can have for free. come find me ingame
Bronze Ogres - 2a
Iridescent Dragons 60 - 1a
Perfectly describes my reaction.
the 3 above where it says insc only drop as both os and insc. air, df, spawning.
SR, insp, es are the insc only ones.
Ones below uninsc are os only supposedly
Thats not to say wiki isn't sometimes wrong tho like on ghostly staves. Wikis are written by the players, so ofc things aren't always correct.
Wiki is dead wrong on this
Shortsword - 4a
Shortsword - 2a
Shortsword - 50e
Pronged Spear - r/b
Jewelled staff - 2a
Doesn't happen often but does happen and its bullshit when it happens. Just like non max weps from dungeon end chests.