not max, not insc, not rare
merch
not max, not insc, not rare
merch
indeed it os somewhat special - there is exactly one mob ingame dropping it - the solitary colossus - and among the possibilities this is lowest possible for a blue shield. this does however not tell if there is an interest in it on the market, but I'd also not merch ![]()
thanks! but no... no max ar for req -> merch
these quirks I have usually seen sell in the low double dirgit arm range. pur for auction and add a realistic b/o after a week or so
it is not that they changed that.
what happened is the following: they made the unid values of the items be fixed value (as on all dungeon end chest), but they made it dependent on party level with thelowest resulting fixed unid value be 10g. now they also fixed a level dependent gold item rate that was non zero for the lowest of level. this leads to gold items at 10g unid, which is lower than the 12g unid for regular item drops. 10g allows for q3, but not q2 and the min stat for 10g is lower than for 12g for most wep types, which is why all the reqs 3-6 will have new min stats from maz chest. hope this makes sense.
New min dmg range for gold q3 staff. From Maz chest loot in pre-searing dungeon.
I do see itis technically a new min... but all weapon types will have a new min stat for our tables in gold rarity from that chest since it does work fundamentally different than reegular drops. question is - do we add them in the table? generally we do not even list min dmg for rarity in the table -should we?
but not exclusively from z-chest because i am 100% sure i've gotten them somewhere in EotN.
good catch! dungeon endchests do also drop these (at least some. I am unaware if all...
gold insc has dropped since introduction of zchest and does now also drop in both new dungeons in pre and post
gold os has dropped in the first days of the new dungeon in pre only in the end chest
purple insc is new since the introduction of the pre dungeon and now drop on those two end chests.
purple os is same situation as gold os.
so technically 2 new prenerf thingies in regards to ball hammers.
rarest and most expencive are two different things also... asking for still dropping stuff or the prenerfery?
one that definitely is the rarest and one of the most expencive is definitely that q8 15% undcond axe. not that it would be for sale... also unique and damn expencive are the henchmen tonics. but there is plenty other things that really are unique but yet not near as valueable. and then ofc there is things that are damn rare, can still drop, but bone has ever been dropped yet. and those that I think of wouldn't come close to the value of those items mentioned before. like the q3 equine aegis for example. it is just that there is not as much use or interest to them. with the amount of botting being done it would definitely not be out of the odds to see one, if it were pursued. but there is no reason to do it since... yeah not as pricey.
yeah - possibly more even. esp if a bid war ensues! put for auction and see
dusk blade should get you 20-50e, mammoth 5-10e, rest I'd merch
aight - 5 more shields to reach the monumental milestone of 50% completion on the "all possible mod combos (no matter req, max, rarity, pre/post or name)"
I'll pay a least of 1a for any new combination till there - help me out!
linked here in the OP are tables of exactly what I need (not 100% updated - 23 shields are not in there yet but I intended to save the update for when I reach the 50%)
"the 20/20"? youmean a sundering modded one? that does not affect price at all. the mod can be changed and costs 1e or less. what makes it valueable is q8 max damage, skin and the perfect inherent (unchangeable) 15^50 mod.
these sell into 1500a+ put for auction and wait. definitely an echovald in those stats will only be a fraction of the price. like 50a maybe
yeah... better run the dungeon for a chance for a gold max q8 crysta - that would definitely be crackers!
accept post payment for pre ball hammer? if so: bo 1a
(I can go first)
pre axes 1a/each (if post payments accepted)
booo! take that dislike yoo! ![]()
but ye... seeing it's on a mel... no way I can get my hands on it anyways - but to anyone out there...
10 ar is fucked up. no gold shield can regularly drop that low. that means maybe we are going to see q2 golds?!
the seller could use an alt account too to grab his own name again no?
yeah, but he could only get his name back so he wouldn't win. arms would be with trade mod and returned to buyer because the afore agreed upon service hasn't reached the buyer.
it is worse even: the buyer can scam everyone, the trade mod can scam anonymously, the seller alone can not really scam.
there is no way any outsider could prove, disprove or verify that a name "lost" is with either party. the buyer can just have an alt, take the name there, say d'oh it's taken, doesn't have it on his main. neither the trade mod nor the seller could ever find out if or if not the buyer got it. so the trusted middleman does not help at all, bc all that brings into play is another party that could anonymously steal the thing of value. a 1:1 would be fairer in that the risk were evenly distributed between buyer and seller: both could do at some point during trade make the bitch move of snatching it on an alt and leaving with arms and the name. the situation would be that whoever went first would have the risk. arms first: buyer at risk, name first: seller at risk. it is even. with a trade mod the trusted reputation won't help. he could snatch it himself and still keep his reputation. the buyer could snatch it and the trade mod couldn't verify and would have to hand arms back leaving the seller without the name, the buyer with the name and the scam done in an untrackable way.
but... there is hope: you COULD buy an extra account, put the name on there, use a trade mod to transfer the account, let the buyer link it to their email (in order for the seller bot able to grab back by password reset or other) and the buyer could then at an undisclosed time to anyone else transfer the name to the main acc. that however would violate eula, would be trackable by anet - likely be persued and possibly end in ban of both accs.
so... really consider IF you want to do a name trade and IF you want to include a third party.
Uh could you elaborate why 660 isnt possible? Multiples of 4 should always work for gold items?
yeah, max ones are multiples of 8, since the formula goes (unid +rnd)×4 and rnd is in the realm of 1-unid.
yup, 488 max for regular drops, treasure from what I know highest is 648. (at least 660 wouldn't be a possible gv for a gold item and highest I have seen was 636 I believe).
and seeing the skin of this item it is very likely it came from a locked chest in the realm, where those high values happen regularly.
not very prout of what we have come to...
I highly doubt ALL NPC names are taken.